The network for young environmentalists

Two new reports from WBGU Germany - Climate negotations and Bioenergy

if you want to know more about current global environmental issues, I can warmly recommend to check the reports from the WBGU. The WBGU is the German Advisory Council on Global Change - an independent think tank of top-class researchers. Comments on the reports below are welcome here in the blog.

The report "World in Transition – Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use" can be downloaded from

The report "Solving the climate dilemma: The budget approach" can be downloaded from

Here is the press release for the Bioenergy report:

Bioenergy for Sustainable Electricity

Bioenergy has the potential to sustainably meet around 10% of the world’s medium-term energy requirement

Berlin, 3 December 2008. In its new report “Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use” WBGU, the German Advisory Council on Global Change, concludes that the global sustainable potential for producing energy from biomass is significant and should be tapped. The report is the first integrated study of bioenergy to explore the issue in the context of both global environmental and development policy. It shows that in the medium term around 10% of the world’s energy needs could be met by sustainable bioenergy from biogenic residues and energy crops. About a quarter of the potential arising from energy crops is located in Central and South America. Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, North America and China each account for around 15%, while India accounts for 6%. However, utilization of this potential should only be pursued if risks to food security as well as to nature conservation and climate change mitigation targets can be excluded. For this to happen, binding sustainability standards need to be introduced at national and international level.

Electric power, not petrol

Bioenergy achieves the greatest contribution to climate change mitigation when it is used to generate electricity. The key approach is to deploy bioenergy to replace energy sources entailing high CO2 emissions, particularly coal. In the electricity sector the climate change mitigation effect of bioenergy is almost twice that of using biofuels for transport or when bioenergy is used to produce heat alone. Because of its high energy efficiency, cogeneration – involving the combined production of both power and heat – is always preferable to pure electricity generation. WBGU recommends that the generation of electricity from biomass be more vigorously promoted, but that promotion be restricted to sustainably produced bioenergy carriers. If biomethane is used to generate electricity, the climate change mitigation effect could be even greater if the CO2 captured in the production process of biomethane could be stored securely.

First generation liquid biofuels such as biodiesel from rape or bioethanol from maize are not suitable for mitigating climate change. If the cultivation of energy crops on agricultural land displaces food production and land elsewhere has to be cleared as a result, more greenhouse gases may be released than would have been the case if fossil fuels had been used. Second generation liquid biofuels, in which the whole above-ground part of the plant is used, perform no better in this regard. By contrast, the use of perennial tropical plants such as sugar cane, oil palm or jatropha – where they are grown on degraded land – can have a substantial positive impact on climate change mitigation. However, considerable damage can be done to the climate if tropical forest is cleared in order to grow these crops. WBGU therefore advocates that the promotion of liquid biofuels for road transport purposes be rapidly abandoned by removing blending quotas and instead expanding electromobility.

Residues are fuels

Biogenic residues such as wood residue, liquid manure and straw are ideal sources of energy, because when used properly they entail very little risk to soils, water or the climate. In addition, they do not compete with food production. The generation of electricity from wastes and residues should therefore be particularly promoted.

Deploying modern bioenergy to tackle energy poverty

There are some 50 developing countries in which traditional bioenergy, involving the burning of wood, dung or crop residues for cooking and heating, still accounts for more than 90% of energy use. As a result, more than 1.5 million people die each year of indoor air pollution. The more widespread use of improved wood or charcoal stoves or of micro biogas systems, and the production of vegetable oils from oil plants such as jatropha, represent an important and as yet insufficiently exploited lever for tackling poverty. These technologies should be promoted, since they can deliver significant improvements in the quality of life of many hundred millions of people within a very short time and at low cost. The opportunities for rural development associated with the cultivation of energy crops should be harnessed. As a first step, however, integrated strategies for bioenergy use and food security need to be drawn up jointly with partner countries.

Views: 36


You need to be a member of eurotope.net2.0 to add comments!

Join eurotope.net2.0

Comment by Mika Huettner on September 13, 2009 at 7:25pm
Hey Eric,
I do not know if the Bali Action Plan and the WBGU approach need to be at odds. The WBGU approach (at least in its very coarse framework) takes up the issue of justice in the greenhouse and how emission reductions should be shared globally. Its also not new - its pretty close to the "contraction and convergence" approach from the Global Commons institute. Despite the high urgency and this guarding rail of climate justice to defend emission reduction shares I think it could work. However you are right....this should have been on the table in Bali already. Lets hope for the impossible in Copenhagen.
I wont be in Bankok, maybe in Barcelona....I am still a poor PhD student ;o)
Thanks for your very good comment!
Rock the show in Bangkok!
Comment by Mika Huettner on September 7, 2009 at 8:33am
I just read it completely. It is frightening to see the urgency the report describes. But the offered policy approach seems to be just and robust, although it will need major efforts by all parties in Copenhagen to be sucessful. Anyone interested in climate change and the related policies should read this report! It is a good preparation for the upcoming climate conference. Hope to see some of your comments on this stuff.

© 2016   Created by Youth and Environment Europe.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service